<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for we want a wind farm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wewantawindfarm.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wewantawindfarm.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:56:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yes, wind power really is green by Denis Walker</title>
		<link>http://wewantawindfarm.org/2010/08/yes-wind-power-really-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wewantawindfarm.org/?p=149#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Thank you for taking the time to comment on the We Want a Wind Farm website.

On 11 Aug 2010, at 14:10, Ron Stephens wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;My site is not anti anything - it&#039;s a pro truth site. I deal in reality and truth - concepts completely outside the grasp of Green sludge crawling on earth at present.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m afraid I have to disagree. The page about Denmark on your website is, as I explain in the article &quot;Yes, wind power really is green,&quot; simply wrong. I haven&#039;t investigated what axe Tony Lodge has to grind, but he clearly has one or he wouldn&#039;t need to fabricate his statistics and make up explanations for them. The increase in coal consumption for electricity generation in Denmark in 2006 was due to it being a particularly dry year, meaning that Norway and Sweden were unable to produce as much electricity from hydro generation. Denmark make up for some of that shortfall by increasing generation from coal. You will find details of this in the Energinet.dk Environmental Report 2007.

Your page on so-called &quot;chemtrails&quot; is blatant conspiracy. What you show in your videos is water vapour produced during combustion condensing as it cools. This is why the trail only starts appearing a short distance behind the plane. When no condensation trail is produced it will be because of the atmospheric conditions at the altitude at which the aeroplane happens to be flying. Even if there was anything to this, what would it have to do with renewable electricity production?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Don&#039;t call yourselves environmentalists - speak the truth for once. Not sure what  that is? Try a dictionary!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am, to the best of my knowledge, truthful in what I say in my article and more generally on the We Want a Wind Farm website. I took great care to name the primary sources for all of the data in the article. If you believe I have said anything that is incorrect, please do correct me, citing the primary sources for your data.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Not one of you Green/UN/depopulation has every agreed to debate me......who about you...……&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am unclear what your issue with the United Nations is, or for that matter with the premise that we should ensure the safety of the earth&#039;s environment to enable our own survival. Nor have I ever campaigned to actively depopulate the planet. I am perfectly happy to have a debate with you, on the understanding that I have other demands on my time, as I am sure you do. There is no point in either of us wasting our time. Please provide the source of any data you rely on; I will do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking the time to comment on the We Want a Wind Farm website.</p>
<p>On 11 Aug 2010, at 14:10, Ron Stephens wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>My site is not anti anything &#8211; it&#8217;s a pro truth site. I deal in reality and truth &#8211; concepts completely outside the grasp of Green sludge crawling on earth at present.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid I have to disagree. The page about Denmark on your website is, as I explain in the article &#8220;Yes, wind power really is green,&#8221; simply wrong. I haven&#8217;t investigated what axe Tony Lodge has to grind, but he clearly has one or he wouldn&#8217;t need to fabricate his statistics and make up explanations for them. The increase in coal consumption for electricity generation in Denmark in 2006 was due to it being a particularly dry year, meaning that Norway and Sweden were unable to produce as much electricity from hydro generation. Denmark make up for some of that shortfall by increasing generation from coal. You will find details of this in the Energinet.dk Environmental Report 2007.</p>
<p>Your page on so-called &#8220;chemtrails&#8221; is blatant conspiracy. What you show in your videos is water vapour produced during combustion condensing as it cools. This is why the trail only starts appearing a short distance behind the plane. When no condensation trail is produced it will be because of the atmospheric conditions at the altitude at which the aeroplane happens to be flying. Even if there was anything to this, what would it have to do with renewable electricity production?</p>
<blockquote><p>Don&#8217;t call yourselves environmentalists &#8211; speak the truth for once. Not sure what  that is? Try a dictionary!</p></blockquote>
<p>I am, to the best of my knowledge, truthful in what I say in my article and more generally on the We Want a Wind Farm website. I took great care to name the primary sources for all of the data in the article. If you believe I have said anything that is incorrect, please do correct me, citing the primary sources for your data.</p>
<blockquote><p>Not one of you Green/UN/depopulation has every agreed to debate me&#8230;&#8230;who about you&#8230;……</p></blockquote>
<p>I am unclear what your issue with the United Nations is, or for that matter with the premise that we should ensure the safety of the earth&#8217;s environment to enable our own survival. Nor have I ever campaigned to actively depopulate the planet. I am perfectly happy to have a debate with you, on the understanding that I have other demands on my time, as I am sure you do. There is no point in either of us wasting our time. Please provide the source of any data you rely on; I will do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yes, wind power really is green by Ron Stephens</title>
		<link>http://wewantawindfarm.org/2010/08/yes-wind-power-really-is-green/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wewantawindfarm.org/?p=149#comment-41</guid>
		<description>My site is not anti anything - it&#039;s a pro truth site. I deal in reality and truth - concepts completely outside the grasp of Green sludge crawling on earth at present. Don&#039;t call yourselves environmentalists - speak the truth for once. Not sure what  that is? Try a dictionary! 
 Not one of you Green/UN/depopulation has every agreed to debate me......who about you.........

&quot;In an attempt to appear less biased (“But don’t take our word for it.”), the leaflet encourages readers to visit http://windfarms.wordpress.com/denmark/. This page features a couple more quotes relating to Denmark and wind farms, which make the same false assertions about carbon emissions and energy prices as are debunked above. It forms part of a website called “Blowing Our Tax Dollars on Wind Farms” which is an Ontario-based anti-wind blog, written by a conspiracy theorist climate change denier called Ron Stephens.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My site is not anti anything &#8211; it&#8217;s a pro truth site. I deal in reality and truth &#8211; concepts completely outside the grasp of Green sludge crawling on earth at present. Don&#8217;t call yourselves environmentalists &#8211; speak the truth for once. Not sure what  that is? Try a dictionary!<br />
 Not one of you Green/UN/depopulation has every agreed to debate me&#8230;&#8230;who about you&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;In an attempt to appear less biased (“But don’t take our word for it.”), the leaflet encourages readers to visit <a href="http://windfarms.wordpress.com/denmark/" rel="nofollow">http://windfarms.wordpress.com/denmark/</a>. This page features a couple more quotes relating to Denmark and wind farms, which make the same false assertions about carbon emissions and energy prices as are debunked above. It forms part of a website called “Blowing Our Tax Dollars on Wind Farms” which is an Ontario-based anti-wind blog, written by a conspiracy theorist climate change denier called Ron Stephens.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Adam Bell</title>
		<link>http://wewantawindfarm.org/about/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwawf.bigreddesign.com/?page_id=2#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Seconding Jonathan - it&#039;s always good to see pro-renewables people get organised locally! We&#039;ve got an active database of renewables supporters on our site - you might find some new support there, if you&#039;d like to try it out. We&#039;ve also got some useful guides for supporters in our &#039;Campaigns&#039; section.

Best of luck,

Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seconding Jonathan &#8211; it&#8217;s always good to see pro-renewables people get organised locally! We&#8217;ve got an active database of renewables supporters on our site &#8211; you might find some new support there, if you&#8217;d like to try it out. We&#8217;ve also got some useful guides for supporters in our &#8216;Campaigns&#8217; section.</p>
<p>Best of luck,</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Jonathan Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://wewantawindfarm.org/about/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwawf.bigreddesign.com/?page_id=2#comment-2</guid>
		<description>It is fantastic to see other pro wind people out there taking on the often misleading and factually incorrect material used by the windy nimby&#039;s - well done to you all. Sustainable Energy Alliance (SEA), based in north Wales has been around for 5 years now and we are proud to be pro wind. Here&#039;s to more wind farms and less nimbyism !!!
       
                                Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is fantastic to see other pro wind people out there taking on the often misleading and factually incorrect material used by the windy nimby&#8217;s &#8211; well done to you all. Sustainable Energy Alliance (SEA), based in north Wales has been around for 5 years now and we are proud to be pro wind. Here&#8217;s to more wind farms and less nimbyism !!!</p>
<p>                                Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
